1. Vanholder, R., Glorieux, G., De Smet, R. and Lameire, N. New insights in uremic toxins. Kidney Int., 2003, 63, 6–10.
doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.63.s84.43.x
2. Gotch, F. A., Sargent, J. A. and Keen, M. L. Whither goest Kt/V? Kidney Int., 2000, 58, 3–18.
doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.07602.x
3. Locatelli, F., Buoncristiani, U., Canaud, B., Khler, H., Petitclerc, T. and Zucchelli, P. Hemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., 2005, 20, 22–33.
doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh555
4. Lesaffer, G., De Smet, R., Lameire, N., Dhondt, A., Duym, P. and Vanholder, R. Intradialytic removal of protein-bound uraemic toxins: role of solute characteristics and of dialyzer membrane. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., 2000, 15, 50–57.
doi:10.1093/ndt/15.1.50
5. De Smet, R., Dhondt, A., Eloot, S., Galli, F., Waterloos, M. A. and Vanholder, R. Effect of the super-flux cellulose triacetate dialyzer membrane on the removal of non-protein-bound and protein-bound uraemic solutes. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., 2007, 22, 2006–2012.
doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm065
6. Daugirdas, J. T. and Depner, T. A. A nomogram approach to hemodialysis urea modeling. Am. J. Kidney Dis., 1994, 23, 33–40.
7. Meert, N., Eloot, S., Waterloo, M. A., Van Landschoot, M., Dhondt, A., Glorieux, G., Ledebo, I. and Vanholder, R. Effective removal of protein-bound uraemic solutes by different convective strategies: a prospective trial. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., 2009, 24, 562–570.
doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn522
8. Ouseph, R., Hutchison, C. and Ward, R. A. Differences in solute removal by two high-flux membranes of nominally similar synthetic polymers. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., 2008, 23, 1704–1712.
doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm916