ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
cover
Estonian Journal of Engineering

Management capabilities and application of complex automated systems; pp. 30–46

Full article in PDF format | doi: 10.3176/eng.2013.1.04

Authors
Kadri Kristjuhan, Ergo Metsla, Hannes Ling

Abstract

Management innovation scholars over the last decade and quality management authorities over several past decades have indicated that companies need effective management practices in order to utilize complex automated systems. However, empirical evidence for a relationship between companies’ management and technological capabilities has been lacking. This study plugs an important gap in empirical evidence of the relationship between companies’ management capabilities and application of complex automated systems. A pilot study was conducted in Estonian companies, which apply robot welding. Evidence of a strong correlation (correlation coefficient of 0.74) between companies’ management capabilities and effectiveness in utilizing this complex technology was shown. The study also revealed a novel survey instrument for studying companies’ management and technological capabilities.


References

  1. Mol, M. J. and Birkinshaw, J. The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. J. Bus. Res., 2009, 62, 1269–1280.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.001

  2. Mizuno, S. Company-wide Total Quality Control. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo, 1988.

  3. Kondo, Y. Companywide Quality Control: Its Background and Development. 3A Corporation, Tokyo, 1999.

  4. Vadi, M., Tepp, M., Reino, A., Ahonen, M., Kaarelson, T., Killumets, E., Leimann, J., Parts, V., Rillo, M., Zernand-Vilson, M. et al. Eesti juhtimisvaldkonna uuring. EAS, Tallinn, 2011.

  5. Gans, K. and Kokla, M. Tootmisjuhtimise operatiivtasandi uuring. EAS, Tallinn, 2011.

  6. Varblane, U., Varblane, U. and Espenberg, K. Eesti masinatööstuse sektoruuring. EAS, Tallinn, 2011.

  7. Luthans, F., Rosenkrantz, S. A. and Hennessey, H. W. What do successful managers really do? An observation study of managerial activities. J. Appl. Beh. Sci., 1985, 21, 255–270.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002188638502100303

  8. Luthans, F. Successful vs. effective real managers. Acad. Manage. Ex., 1988, 2, 127–132.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AME.1988.4275524

  9. Fayol, H. General and Industrial Management. Pitman, London, 1949.

10. Daft, R. Management. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, 2012.

11. Drucker, P. F. The Practice of Management. Harper Collins Publ. Inc., New York, 1982.

12. Mintzberg, H. Managerial work: Analysis from observation. Manage. Sci., 1971, 18, B-97–110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.18.2.B97

13. Kotter, J. P. The General Managers. Free Press, New York, 1982.

14. Floyd, S. W and Wooldridge, B. Middle management involvement in strategy and its association with strategic type. Strat. Manage. J., 1992, 13, 153–167.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131012

15. Carroll, S. J. and Gillen, D. J. Are the classical management functions useful in describing managerial work? Acad. Manage. Rev., 1987, 12, 38–51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1987.4306460

16. Asllani, A. and Luthans, F. What knowledge managers really do: An empirical and comparative analysis. J. Know. Manage., 2003, 7, 53–66.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673270310485622

17. O’Driscoll, M. P., Humphries, M. and Larsen, H. H. Managerial activities, competence and effectiveness: Manager and subordinate perceptions. Int. J. HR Manage., 1991, 2, 313–326.

18. Holcomb, T. R., Holmes, M. R., Jr. and Conelly, B. L. Making the most of what you have: Managerial ability as a source of resource value creation. Strat. Manage. J., 2009, 30, 457–485.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.747

19. Richard, J. P., Devinney, M. T., Yip, S. G. and Johnson, G. Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. J. Manage., 2009, 35, 718–804.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560

20. Horovitz, J. H. and Thietart, R. A. Strategy, management design and firm perfomance. Strat. Manage. J., 1982, 3, 67–76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030106

21. Bloom, N. and Van Reenen, J. Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econ., 2007, 122, 1351–1408.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1351

22. Svirina, A. Measuring managerial efficiency: A balanced approach. Gl. J. Bus. Res., 2010, 4, 97–104.

23. Loveridge, K. Non-financial performance indicators. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management (Cooper, C. L., ed.). Blackwell Publ. http://www.blackwellreference.com/ subscriber/tocnode?id=g9780631233176_chunk_g978140511828621_ss6-1 (29.02.2012).

24. Kelley, D. J., O’Connor, G. C., Neck, H. and Peters, L. Building an organizational capability for radical innovation: The direct managerial role. J. Eng. Technol. Manage., 2011, 28, 249–267.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2011.06.003

25. Wang, E. G., Klein, G. and Jiang, J. J. ERP misfit: Country of origin and organizational factors. J. Manage. Inf. Syst., 2006, 23, 263–292.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230109

26. Bloom, N., Sadun, R. and Van Reenen, J. It ain’t what you do, it’s the way that you do I.T. Investigating the productivity miracle using U.S. multinationals. Working paper. http://www.cepr.org/meets/wkcn/6/6644/papers/Van%20Reenen%20paper.pdf (31.01.2012).

27. Statistics Estonia, Tallinn, 2013. http://www.stat.ee (08.02.2013).


Back to Issue