ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
cover
Estonian Journal of Engineering

Engineering optimization of a car frontal protection system component; pp. 61–72

Full article in PDF format | doi: 10.3176/eng.2009.1.06

Authors
Meelis Pohlak, Jüri Majak, Martin Eerme

Abstract
The study focuses on the design of a car frontal protection system using response surface modelling and a genetic algorithm. The main attention was paid to optimal design of brackets. The analysis of car–pedestrian collision situation was performed using explicit FEA solver and the stiffness analysis of the bracket with implicit FEA solver. Multi-criteria optimal design problem was formulated and the necessary optimality conditions were derived. The obtained numerical results were validated by comparing with experimental test results. An alternative numerical approach was realized using optimization software package LS-OPT.
References

  1. Al Galib, D. and Limam, A. Experimental and numerical investigation of static and dynamic axial crushing of circular aluminum tubes. Thin-Walled Structures, 2004, 42, 1103–1137.
doi:10.1016/j.tws.2004.03.001

  2. Alghamdi, A. A. A. Collapsible impact energy absorbers: an overview. Thin-Walled Structures, 2001, 39, 189–213.
doi:10.1016/S0263-8231(00)00048-3

  3. Gupta, S. Using CAE to evaluate structural foam alternatives in B-pillar and bumper designs. In Proc. 3rd European LS-DYNA Users Conference, Paris, 2001.

  4. Griškevičius, P. and Žiliukas, A. The impact energy absorption of the vehicles front structures. Transport, 2003, 18, 97–101.

  5. De Kanter, J. Energy Absorption of Monolithic and Fibre Reinforced Aluminium Cylinders. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, 2006.

  6. Matsui, Y. Effects of vehicle bumper height and impact velocity on type of lower extremity injury in vehicle–pedestrian accidents. Accident Anal. Prevention, 2005, 37, 633–640.
doi:10.1016/j.aap.2005.03.005

  7. Schuster, P. J. Current trends in bumper design for pedestrian impact. SAE Technical Papers, 2006, No. 2006-01-0464.

  8. Hörmann, M., Schulz, A. and Rust, W. Structural optimization using LS-OPT: Basics and examples. In Proc. 21st CAD-FEM Users’ Meeting. Potsdam, 2003.

  9. Wang, H., Müllerschön, H. and Mehrens, T. Shape optimization of a crashbox using hyperMorph and LS-OPT. In Proc. 4th German LS-DYNA Forum. Bamberg, 2005.

10. Pohlak, M., Majak, J. and Eerme, M. Optimization of car frontal protection system. Int. J. Simulation Multidisciplinary Design Optim., 2007, 1, 31–37.
doi:10.1051/ijsmdo:2007004

11. Directive 2005/66/Ec of the European Parliament and of the Council. http://eurlex.europa.eu/ LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2005/l_309/l_30920051125en00370054

12. Lu, G. and Yu, T. X. Energy Absorption of Structures and Materials. Woodhead Publ., Cambridge, 2003.

13. Stander, N., Roux, W., Goel, T., Eggleston, T. and Craig, K. LS-OPT User’s Manual: A Design Optimization and Probabilistic Analysis Tool for the Engineering Analyst. Livermore Soft­ware Technology Corporation, 2008.

14. Deepa, K. and Das, K. N. Quadratic approximation based hybrid genetic algorithm for function optimization. Appl. Math. Comput., 2008, 203, 86–98.
doi:10.1016/j.amc.2008.04.021

15. Spall, J. C. Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization. Wiley-Interscience, 2003.
doi:10.1002/0471722138


Back to Issue