EAP - Estonian Journal of Ecology Publications

Estonian Journal of Ecology

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Vol. 57, Issue 4 Vol. 57, Issue 3 Vol. 57, Issue 2 Vol. 57, Issue 1

Open Access Journal

A methodology of the satellite mapping and monitoring of protected landscapes in Estonia; pp. 159–184

PDF | doi: 10.3176/eco.2008.3.01

Authors

Kiira Aaviksoo, Karin Muru

Abstract

The paper presents a methodology and reports on the results of land cover monitoring of seven protected areas covering 3600 km² using Landsat images from the years 1986–1998. An extensive Land Cover Nomenclature containing 87 categories was elaborated by applying a hybrid classification process combined with classification masks. Land cover changes were monitored and modelled using the Markov Model approach, which characterized the magnitude, direction, and rate of dominant processes, and was used for the prediction of future developments. Landscape diversity parameters and indices were calculated and their changes monitored. The use of Landsat 5 TM satellite imagery combined with ancillary data, GIS, and fieldwork serves as an efficient means for medium-scale landscape monitoring, which is needed in managing protected landscapes. Monitoring maps reveal the main environmental trends over ten years (from the 1980s to the 1990s). This makes it possible to predict threats to conservation objectives, and serves as a reliable input for local and international environment management efforts.

References

Aaviksoo, K. 1988. Natural and anthropogenous changes in a mire and its neighborhood. In Dynamics and Ecology of Wetlands and Lakes in Estonia (Zobel, M., ed.), pp. 90–105. Acad. Sci. Est. SSR, MAB, Tallinn.

Aaviksoo, K. 1993a. Application of Markov Models in Investigation of Vegetation and Land Use Dynamics in Estonian Mire Landscapes. PhD thesis, University of Tartu.

Aaviksoo, K. 1993b. Changes of plant cover and land use types (1950’s to 1980’s) in three mire reserves and their neighbourhood in Estonia. Landscape Ecol., 8(4), 287–301.
doi:10.1007/BF00125134

Aaviksoo, K. 1995a. Simulating vegetation dynamics and land use in a mire landscape using a Markov model. Landscape Urban Plan., 31, 129–142.
doi:10.1016/0169-2046(94)01045-A

Aaviksoo, K. 1995b. Vegetation of Endla Nature Reserve classified on the basis of Landsat TM data. In Consortium Masingii (Aaviksoo, K., Kull, K., Paal, J. & Trass, H., eds), pp. 27–36. Tartu.

Aaviksoo, K. 2004. Eesti maastike kaugseire – olemus, tulemus ja tulevikunägemus. In Kaugseire alased uuringud Eestis (Oja, T. & Nilson, T., eds). Publ. Inst. Geogr. Univ. Tartu., 95, 185–200.

Aaviksoo, K. & Kadarik, H. 1989. Dynamics of wetland landscapes and reliability of prediction of their development. Sov. J. Ecol., 20(4), 221–226.

Aaviksoo, K. & Leivits, A. 2001. Combining multi-date remote sensing and longterm bird census data in two mire landscapes in Estonia. http://nigula.ee/pub/landcover1.pdf

Aaviksoo, K. & Meiner, A. 2001. Satellite monitoring of Estonian landscapes. Publ. Inst. Geogr. Univ. Tartu., 92, 233–238.

Aaviksoo, K. & Muru, K. 2001. Lahemaa maastike satelliitseire. ELUS AR, 80, 18–52.

Aaviksoo, K., Paal, J. & Dislis, T. 2000. Mapping of wetland habitat diversity using satellite data and GIS: An example from the Alam-Pedja Nature Reserve, Estonia. Proc. Est. Acad. Sci. Biol. Ecol., 49, 177–193.

Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T. & Witmer, R. E. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. U.S. Geological Survey. Professional Paper, 964, 1–28.

Arold, I. 2005. Eesti maastikud. Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.

Bastian, O., Krönert, R. & Lipsky, Z. 2006. Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales – a challenge for landscape planning. Landscape Ecol., 21, 359–374.
doi:10.1007/s10980-005-5224-1

Bossard, M., Feranec, J. & Otahel, J. 2000. CORINE Land Cover Technical Guide – Addendum Technical Report, 40. EPA.

Büttner, G., Feranec, J., Jaffrain, G., Mari, L., Maucha, G. & Soukup, T. 2004. The CORINE Land Cover 2000 Project. EARSeL eProc., 3(3), 331–346. http://las.physik.uni-oldenburg.de/eProceedings/

Cohen, W. B. & Goward, N. 2004. Landsat’s role in ecological applications of remote sensing. Bioscience, 54(6), 535–545.
doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0535:LRIEAO]2.0.CO;2

Congalton, R. G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ., 37, 35–46.
doi:10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B

Dale, V., Fortes, D. T. & Ashwood, T. L. 2002. A landscape-transition matrix approach for land management. In Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management (Liu, J. & Taylor, W. W., eds), pp. 265–293. Cambridge University Press.

Debussche, M., Gordon, M., Lepart, L. & Romane, F. 1977. An account of the use of a transition matrix. Agro-ecosysystems, 3, 81–92.
doi:10.1016/0304-3746(76)90109-8

Di Gregorio, A. & Jansen, L. J. M. 2000. Land Cover Classification System (LCCS): Classification Concepts and User Manual. FAO, Rome.

Ehlers, M. & Rhein, U. 1995. Environmental monitoring – statewide comparative landuse classification in Lower Saxony focusing on moor and pasture areas. In Proc. 9th Int. Symp. on Computer Science for Environ. Protection CSEP’95, 1, 209–218. Berlin.

Flamenco-Sandoval, A., Ramos, M. M. & Masera, O. R. 2007. Assessing implications of land-use and land-cover change dynamics for conservation of a highly diverse tropical rain forest. Biol. Cons., 138(1–2), 131–145.
doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.022

Forman, R. T. T. 1995. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecol., 10(3), 133–142.
doi:10.1007/BF00133027

Groom, G., Mücher, C. A., Ihse, M. & Wrbka, T. 2005. Remote sensing in landscape ecology: Experiences and perspectives in a European context. Landscape Ecol., 20(6), 627–644.
doi:10.1007/s10980-004-3164-9

Grossman, D. H., Faber-Langendoen, D., Weakley, A. S., Anderson, M., Bourgeron, P., Crawford, R., Goodin, K., Landaal, S., Metzler, K., Patterson, K. D., Pyne, M., Reid, M. & Sneddon, L. 1998. International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States. Vol. I. The Nature Conservancy. Arlington, VA.

Heymann, Y., Steenmans, Ch., Croisille, G. & Bossard, M. 1994. CORINE Land Cover. Technical Guide. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

Hilbert, K. W. 2006. Land cover change within the Grand Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve: 1974–2001. J. Coast. Res., 22(6), 1552–1557.
doi:10.2112/05-0582.1

Howard, D., Bunce, R., Jones, M. & Haines-Young, R. 1995. Development of the Countryside Information System. Countryside Survey 1990 Series, Vol. 2. London.

Jensen, J. R. 1996. Introductory Digital Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.

Kalda, A. 1991. Large-scale vegetation mapping in the planning of nature conservation area. In Scripta Botanica 6 (Leht, M., ed.), pp. 98–111. Tallinn.

Kintz, D. B., Young, K. R. & Crews-Meyer, K. A. 2006. Implications of land use/land cover change in the buffer zone of a national park in the tropical Andes. Environ. Manage., 38(2), 238–252.
doi:10.1007/s00267-005-0147-9

Krall, H., Pork, K., Aug, H., Püss, E., Rooma, I. & Teras, T. 1980. Eesti NSV looduslike rohumaade tüübid ja tähtsamad taimekooslused. Eesti NSV Põllumajandusministeeriumi Informatsiooni ja Juurutamise Valitsus, Tallinn.

Krummel, J. R. & Gardner, R. H. 1987. Landscape pattern in a disturbed environment. Oikos, 48, 321–324.
doi:10.2307/3565520

Laasimer, L. 1965. Eesti NSV taimkate. Valgus, Tallinn.

Langanke, T., Burnett, C. & Lang, S. 2007. Assessing the mire conservation status of a raised bog site in Salzburg using object-based monitoring and structural analysis. Landscape Urban Plan., 79, 160–169.
doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.006

Leser, H. & Rodd, H. 1991. Landscape ecology – fundamentals, aims and perspectives. In Modern Ecology: Basic and Applied Aspects (Esser, G. & Overdieck, D., eds), pp. 831–844. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Lillesand, T. M. & Kiefer, R. W. 2000. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. Wiley, New York.

Lõhmus, E. 1984. Eesti metsakasvukohatüübid. Eesti NSV Agrotööstuskoondise Info- ja Juurutusvalitsus, Tallinn.

Marvet, A. 1970. Eesti taimekoosluste määraja. Abiks loodusvaatlejale, 61. Teaduste Akadeemia, Tartu.

Masing, V. 1984. Estonian bogs: Plant cover, succession and classification. In European Mires(Moore, P. D., ed.), pp. 120–148. Academic Press, London.

Mather, P. M. 1993. Computer Processing of Remotely-sensed Images. Wiley, Great Britain.

McGarigal, K. & Marks, M. 1995. Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

Meiner, A. (ed.). 1999. Land Cover of Estonia. Implementation of CORINE Land Cover Project in Estonia. Ministry of the Environment, Estonian Information Centre, Tallinn.

Menard, S., Kindscher, K. & Peterson, D. 2002. Using Ecological Systems as Land Cover Map Units for the GAP Analysis Program in Kansas: Summary Report to USGS-BRD Gap Analysis Program. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN and Kansas Biological Survey, Lawrence, KS. Unpublished report.

O’Neill, R. V., Krummel, J. R., Gardner, R. H., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D. L., Milne, B. T., Turner, M. G., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S. W., Dale, V. H. & Graham, R. L. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol., 1(3), 153–162.
doi:10.1007/BF00162741

O’Neill, R. V., Jones, K. B., Riitters, K. H., Wickham, J. D. & Goodman, I. A. 1994. Landscape Monitoring and Assessment Research Plan. EPA, Washington.

Ozdemir, I., Asan, U., Koch, B., Yesil, A., Ozkan, U. Y. & Hemphill, S. 2005. Comparison of Quickbird-2 and Landsat-7 ETM+ data for mapping of vegetation cover in Fethiye-Kumluova coastal dune in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Fresenius Environ. Bull., 14(9), 823–831.

Paal, J. 1997. Eesti taimkatte kasvukohatüüpide klassifikatsioon. Keskkonnaministeeriumi Info- ja tehnokeskus, Tallinn.

PCI User’s Guide Ver. 6.0. 1995. Ontario.

Poulin, M., Careau, D., Rochefort, L. & Desrochers, A. 2002. From satellite imagery to peatland vegetation diversity: How reliable are habitat maps? Cons. Ecol., 6(2).

RESE (Remote Sensing for the Environment). 1999. Programme Plan Phase II 2000–2002.

Riigi Teataja I. 1999. 81, 741.

Schowengerdt, R. A. 1997. Remote Sensing, Model and Methods for Image Processing. Academic Press, San Diego.

Sepp, E. & Kiis, K. 2007. Matsalu rahvuspargi ja Nigula looduskaitseala satelliitseire 1986–2001. Riiklik keskkonnaseire programm, alamprogramm “Eluslooduse mitmekesisuse ja maastike seire”, allprogramm “Maastike kaugseire”. http://eelis.ic.envir.ee:88/seireveeb/

Singh, A. 1989. Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. Review article. Int. J. Remote Sens., 10(6), 989–1003.
doi:10.1080/01431168908903939

Sirel, K. 2008. Kaitsealad, hoiualad ja kohalikud objektid seisuga 31.12.2007. http://eelis.ic.envir.ee

Stoms, D. M. & Estes, J. E. 1995. A remote sensing research agenda for mapping and monitoring biodiversity. Int. J. Remote Sens., 14(10), 1839–1860.
doi:10.1080/01431169308954007

UNESCO. 1973. UNESCO International Classification and Mapping of Vegetation. Paris.

Valk, U. (ed.). 1988. Eesti sood. Valgus, Tallinn.

Von Wehrden, H., Wesche, K., Miehe, G. & Reudenbach, C. 2006. Vegetation mapping in Central Asian dry eco-systems using Landsat ETM+ – a case study on the Gobi Gurvan Sayhan National Park. Erdkunde, 60(3), 261–272.
doi:10.3112/erdkunde.2006.03.05

Welch, R., Remillard, M. & Dore, R. F. 1995. GIS database development for South Florida’s national parks and preserves. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 61(11), 1371–1381.

Zheng, D., Wallin, D. O. & Hao, Z. 1997. Rates and patterns of landscape change between 1972 and 1988 in the Changbai Mountain area of China and North Korea. Landscape Ecol., 12(5), 241–254.
doi:10.1023/A:1007963324520

Back to Issue

→ Back issues