Hydromorphological quality assessment is an important research topic, especially after the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. In this study the hydromorphological quality at 46 sites in 22 streams of the Venta River Basin District (RBD) in Latvia was investigated during the vegetation periods of 2011–2013. The UK River Habitat Survey method was used in the research. No significant differences in Habitat Quality Assessment (HQA) and Habitat Modification Scores (HMS) were found between stream types. We found that the most important factor affecting HQA scores in our research territory was instream vegetation, which coincides with results of other researchers. There was a significant negative correlation between HQA and HMS. Distance from the source had a negative correlation with HQA and a positive correlation with HMS. River type had a positive correlation with special features (beaver dams, fringing reed bank, wetlands, etc.).
Birk, S. 2003. Review of European assessment methods for rivers and streams using Benthic Invertebrates, Aquatic Flora, Fish and Hydromorphology. Diploma thesis. University of Duisburg-Essen.
Bizzi, S. and Lerner, D. N. 2012. Characterizing physical habitats in rivers using map-derived drivers of fluvial geomorphic processes. Geomorphology, 169–170, 64–73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.009
Boon, P., Holmes, N. T. H., and Raven, P. 2010. Developing standard approaches for recording and assessing river hydromorphology: the role of the European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 20, 55–61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.1097
Briede, A., Springe, G., and Skuja, A. 2005. The influence of hydromorphological feature on the quality of stream in Latvia. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Vereinein Limnologie, 29, 1075–1079.
Buffagni, A. and Kemp, J. L. 2002. Looking beyond the shores of the United Kingdom: addenda for the application of River Habitat Survey in South-European rivers. Journal of Limnology, 61, 199–214.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2002.199
Davy-Bowker, J., Davies, C. E., and Murphy, J. F. 2008. Rapid 2.1: User Manual. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, U.K.
Erba, S., Buffagni, A., Holmes, N., O’Hare, M., Scarlett, P., and Stenico, A. 2006. Preliminary testing of River Habitat Survey features for the aims of the WFD hydro-morphological assessment: an overview from the STAR Project. Hydrobiologia, 566, 281–296.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0089-0
European Commission. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal, L 327, 22/12/2000 P. 0001–0073.
Feld, C. K. 2004. Identification and measure of hydromorphological degradation in Central European lowland streams. Hydrobiologia, 516, 69–90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025259.01054.f2
Friberg, N., Baatrup-Pedersen, A., Pedersen, M. L., and Skriver, J. 2005. The new Danish stream monitoring programme (Novana) – preparing monitoring activities for the Water Framework Directive era. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 111, 27–42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-8038-3
Glazaceva, L. 1980. Hydrological Regionality. University of Latvia, Riga.
Grīnberga, L. 2010. Environmental factors influencing the species diversity of macrophytes in middle-sized streams in Latvia. Hydrobiologia, 656, 233–241.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0432-3
Kamp, U., Binder, W., and Hölzl, K. 2007. River habitat monitoring and assessment in Germany. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 127, 209–226.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9274-x
Kronvang, B., Andersen, I. K., Hoffmann, C. C., Pedersen, M. L., Ovesen, N. B., and Andersen, H. E. 2007. Water exchange and deposition of sediment and phosphorus during inundation of natural and restored lowland floodplains. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 181, 115–121.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9283-y
Latvijas Republikas Ministru kabineta rīkojums Nr. 328. 2008. Par valsts meliorācijas sistēmu un valsts nozīmes meliorācijas sistēmu nodošanu valsts sabiedrības ar ierobežotu atbildību “Zemkopības ministrijas nekustamie īpašumi” valdījumā. Pieņemti, 13.06.2008.
Logan, P. and Furse, M. 2002. Preparing for the European Water Framework Directive – making the links between habitat and aquatic biota. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 12, 425–437.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.535
Lorenz, A., Hering, D., Feld, C. K., and Rolauffs, P. 2004. A new method for assessing the impact of hydromorphological degradation on the macroinvertebrate fauna of five German stream types. Hydrobiologia, 516, 107–127.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025261.79761.b3
Muhar, S. and Jungwirth, M. 1998. Habitat integrity of running waters – assessment criteria and their biological relevance. Hydrobiologia, 386, 195–202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003588631679
Muhar, S., Schwarz, M., Schmutz, S., and Jungwirth, M. 2000. Identification of rivers with high and good habitat quality: methodological approach and applications in Austria. Hydrobiologia, 422/423, 343–358.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017005914029
O’Hare, M. T., Baatrup-Pedersen, A., Nijboer, R., Szoszkiewicz, K., and Ferreira, T. 2006. Macrophyte communities of European streams with altered physical habitat. Hydrobiologia, 566, 197–210.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0095-2
Raven, P. J., Holmes, N. T. H., Dawson, F. H., and Everard, M. 1998. Quality assessment using River Habitat Survey data. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8, 477–499.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199807/08)8:4<477::AID-AQC299>3.0.CO;2-K
Raven, P. J., Holmes, N. T. H., Naura, M., and Dawson, F. H. 2000. Using river habitat survey for environmental assessment and catchment planning in the UK. Hydrobiologia, 422/423, 359–367.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017026417664
Raven, P. J., Holmes, N. T. H., Charrier, P., Dawson, F. H., Naura, M., and Boon, P. J. 2002. Towards a harmonized approach for hydromorphological assessment of rivers in Europe:
a qualitative comparison of three survey methods. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 12(4), 405–424.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.536
Riis, T. and Biggs, B. J. F. 2003. Hydrologic and hydraulic control of macrophyte establishment and performance in streams. Limnology and Oceanography, 48, 1488–1497.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.4.1488
Rinaldi, M., Surian, N., Comiti, F., and Bussettini, M. 2013. A method for the assessment and analysis of the hydromorphological condition of Italian streams: the Morphological Quality Index (MQI). Geomorphology, 180–181, 96–108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.09.009
Sala, O. E., Chapin, F. S. III, Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., Kinzig, A., Leemans, R., Lodge, D. M., Mooney, H. A., Oesterheld, M., Poff, N. L., Sykes, M. T., Walker, B. H., Walker, M., and Wall, D. H. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287, 1770–1774.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1770
Šķiņķis, C. 1992. Hidromeliorācijas ietekme uz dabu. Zinātne, Rīga.
Sparks, R. E. 1995. Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their flood-plains. BioScience, 45, 168–182.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1312556
Springe, G., Grinberga, L., and Briede, A. 2010. Role of the hydrological and hydromorphological factors in ecological quality of the medium-sized lowland streams. Hydrology Research, 41, 330–337.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/nh.2010.119
Stanford, J. A., Ward, J. V., Liss, W. J., Frissell, C. A., Williams, R. N., Lichatowich, J. A., and Coutant, C. C. 1996. A general protocol for restoration of regulated rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 12, 391–413.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199607)12:4/5<391::AID-RRR436>3.3.CO;2-W
Szoszkiewicz, K., Buffagni, A., Davy-Bowker, J., Lesny, J., Chojnicki, B., Zbierska, J., Staniszewski, R., and Zgola, T. 2006. Occurrence and variability of River Habitat Survey features across Europe and the consequences for data collection and evaluation. Hydrobiologia, 566, 267–280.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0090-7
Szoszkiewicz, K., Jusik, S., Lawniczak, A. E., and Zgola, T. 2010. Macrophyte development in unimpacted lowland rivers in Poland. Hydrobiologia, 656, 117–131.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0439-9
Timm, H., Käiro, K., Möls, T., and Virro, T. 2011. An index to assess hydromorphological quality of Estonian surface waters based on macroinvertebrate taxonomic composition. Limnologica, 41, 398–410.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2011.09.006
Tremp, H. 2007. Spatial and environmental effects on hydrophytic macrophyte occurrence in the Upper Rhine floodplain (Germany). Hydrobiologia, 586, 167–177.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0617-6
Urosev, M., Milanovic, A., and Milijaševic, D. 2009. Assessment of the river habitat quality in undeveloped areas of Serbia applying the RHS (River Habitat Survey) method. Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijic” SASA, 59(2), 37–58.
Ventas upju baseina apgabala apsaimniekošanas plāns 2010.–2015. gadam. 2009.
http://www.varam.gov.lv/ lat/darbibas_veidi/udens_aizsardziba_/upju_baseini/ (accessed 20.07.2014).
