We analyse the use of medicinal plants by local populations from two parishes in central Estonia in the 1930s applying a model of herbal landscape. Our study, based on archived records
of traditional ecological knowledge of 11 schoolchildren and 5 adults, compares the individuals’ expertise of medicinal plants to the common knowledge of the local community. This shared knowledge, passed on from generation to generation inside the community (ecocultural commons), is distributed unequally among its members. The results of the study show that 65 plant and 3 fungi taxa were used in folk medicine to deal with 49 indications. Further, the study reveals how knowledge on plants was distributed among individuals throughout the local communities and how folk wisdom about medicinal plants was preserved. The individual herbal landscapes of the respondents varied considerably, with the usage of many plants shared by only a few members of the community. Still, the general pattern of the communal herbal landscape follows relatively well the pattern of the plant use in folk medicine in Estonia at the time under review, with just a few exceptions. Hence, every person partakes in the knowledge of the ecocultural commons, whereas the individual share of the community’s knowledge is not complete.
Etkin, N. L. 1993. Anthropological methods in ethnopharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol., 38, 93–104.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(93)90003-N
Eyssartier, C., Ladio, A. H. & Lozada, M. 2008. Cultural transmission of traditional knowledge in two populations of north-western Patagonia. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed., 4, 25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-4-25
Farina, A. 2000. The cultural landscape as a model for the integration of ecology and economics. Bioscience, 50, 313–320.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0313:TCLAAM]2.3.CO;2
Farina, A. 2006. Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology. Toward a Science of Landscape. Springer, Netherlands.
Gesler, W. M. 2009. Therapeutic landscapes. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Kitchin, R. & Thrift, N., eds), pp. 229–230. Elsevier, Oxford.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00351-5
Haber, W. 2004. Landscape ecology as a bridge from ecosystems to human ecology. Ecol. Res., 19, 99–106.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00615.x
Jarić, S., Zorica, P., Mačukanović-Jocić, M., Djurdjević, L., Mijatović, M., Karadžić, B., Mitrović, M. & Pavlović, P. 2007. An ethnobotanical study on the usage of wild medicinal herbs from Kopaonik mountain (central Serbia). J. Ethnopharmacol., 111(1), 160–175.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.11.007
Kukk, T. 1999. Eesti taimestik [Vascular plant flora of Estonia]. Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus, Tallinn.
Kvell, K. 2003. Mägede mõhnastiku matkarada. http://www.hot.ee/loodusmatkale/jalgsi/magede.html (accessed 13.07.2011).
Laasimer, L. 1965. Eesti NSV taimkate. Valgus, Tallinn.
Lira, R., Casas, A., Rosas-López, R., Paredes-Flores, M., Pérez-Negrón, E., Rangel-Landa, S., Solís, L., Torres, I. & Dávila, P. 2009. Traditional knowledge and useful plant richness in the Tehuacán–Cuicatlán valley, Mexico. Econ. Bot., 63, 271–287.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12231-009-9075-6
Lozada, M., Ladio, A. & Weigandt, M. 2006. Cultural transmission of ethnobotanical knowledge in a rural community of northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. Econ. Bot., 60, 374–385.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[374:CTOEKI]2.0.CO;2
Łuczaj, J. L. 2010. Plant identification credibility in ethnobotany: a closer look at Polish ethnographic studies. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed., 6, 36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-6-36
Lunts, J. 1937a. Põhja-Eesti vallseljakute taimkattest. The vegetation of the North-Estonian ridges. Eesti Loodus, 5(3), 104–108.
Lunts, J. 1937b. Põhja-Eesti vallseljakute taimkattest II. Tapa ümbruse vallseljakud. The vegetation of the North-Estonian eskers. Eesti Loodus, 5(4), 140–144.
Lunts, J. 1938. Uhtlamm-mets Jänijõel. Riverplain forests near the Jänijõgi. Eesti Loodus, 6(3), 124–128.
Michelson, K. 1935. Viivuke taimeteadusliku “keelepaja” juures. Loodusvaatleja, 1, 6–9.
Molares, S. & Ladio, A. 2009. Ethnobotanical review of the Mapuche medicinal flora: use patterns on a regional scale. J. Ethnopharmacol., 122(2), 251–260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2009.01.003
Müller-Schwarze, N. 2006. Antes and Hoy Día: plant knowledge and categorization as adaptations to life in Panama in the twenty-first century. Econ. Bot., 60, 321–334.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[321:AAHDPK]2.0.CO;2
Pieroni, A., Nebel, S., Quave, C., Münz, H. & Heinrich, M. 2002. Ethnopharmacology of liakra: traditional weedy vegetables of the Arbëreshë of the Vulture area in southern Italy. J. Ethnopharmacol., 81, 165–185.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00052-1
Rannap, H. 1998. Eesti kooli biograafiline leksikon [Biographical Lexicon of Estonian School]. Eesti Entsüklopeediakirjastus, Tallinn.
Reyes-García, V., Byron, E., Vadez, V., Godoy, R., Apaza, L., Pérez Limache, E., Leonard, W. R. & Wilkie, D. 2004. Measuring culture as shared knowledge: Do data collection formats matter? Cultural knowledge of plant uses among Tsimane’ Amerindians, Bolivia. Field Methods, 16(2), 135–156.
Sõukand, R. 2010. Herbal Landscape. Dissertationes Semioticae Universitatis Tartuensis, 14. Tartu University Press, Tartu.
Sõukand, R. & Kalle, R. 2008. Historistlik Eesti Rahvameditsiini Botaaniline Andmebaas (HERBA) [HERBA, the Estonian Folk Medicine Database of Plant Use]. http://herba.folklore.ee
Sõukand, R. & Kalle, R. 2010a. Plant as object within herbal landscape: different kinds of perception. Biosemiotics, 3(3), 299–313.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12304-010-9078-9
Sõukand, R. & Kalle, R. 2010b. Herbal landscape: the perception of the landscape as a source of medicinal plants. Trames, 14(64/59)(3), 207–226.
Sõukand, R. & Kalle, R. 2011. Change in medical plant use in Estonian ethnomedicine: a historical comparison between 1888 and 1994. J. Ethnopharmacol., 135, 251–260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2011.02.030
Sõukand, R. & Raal, A. 2008. How the name Arnica was borrowed into Estonian. Trames, 12(1), 29–39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3176/tr.2008.1.02
Svanberg, I., Łuczaj, J. L., Pardo-de-Santayana, M. & Pieroni, A. 2011. History and current trends of ethnobiological research in Europe. In Ethnobiology (Anderson, E. N., Persall, D., Hunn, E. & Turner, N. J., eds), pp. 191–214. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118015872.ch12
Tardìo, J. & Pardo-de-Santayana, M. 2008. Cultural importance indices: a comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Econ. Bot., 62,
24–39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12231-007-9004-5
Thomas, E., Vandebroek, I., Van Damme, P., Goetghebeur, P., Douterlungne, D., Sanca, S. & Arrazola, S. 2009. The relation between accessibility, diversity and indigenous valuation of vegetation in the Bolivian Andes. J. Arid Environ., 73(9), 854–861.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.03.010
Tolman, E. C. 1948. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol. Rev., 55(4), 189–208.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0061626
Vandebroek, I. 2010. The dual intracultural and intercultural relationship between medicinal plant knowledge and consensus. Econ. Bot., 64(4), 303–317.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12231-010-9135-y
Vandebroek, I., Van Damme, P., Van Puyveldeb, L., Arrazolac, S. & De Kimpe, N. 2004. A comparison of traditional healers’ medicinal plant knowledge in the Bolivian Andes and Amazon. Soc. Sci. Med., 59, 837–849.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00275.x
