Fine comb teeth that often broke were the weakest part of bone combs. There were two possibilities in the subsequent life of such a comb – it was either thrown away or repaired. If repaired the broken part could be replaced or the shape of the artefact modified. The chosen version might have depended on the skills of the repairer. In both cases, the biography of the comb would continue within the same function and meaning sphere as before breaking. Sometimes it was not possible to repair the comb in the way that it could be used for combing again. Artefacts do not have biographies without people. Is it possible to find out who tried to give a new life to a broken artefact and why?
Appadurai, A. 1986. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. – The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Ed. A. Appadurai. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 3–63.
Caple, C. 2000. Conservation Skills. Judgement, Method and Decision Making. Routledge, London.
Caple, C. 2006. Objects. Reluctant Witnesses to the Past. Routledge, London.
Choyke, A. M. 2006. Bone tools for a lifetime: experience and belonging. – Normes techniques et pratiques sociales. De la simplicité des outillages pré- et protohistoriques. XXVIe. rencontres internationales d’archéologie et d’histoire d’Antibes. Eds L. Astruc, F. Bon, V. Léa, P.-Y. Milcent & S. Philibert. Éditions APDCA, Antibes, 49–60.
Choyke, A. M. 2007. Objects for a lifetime – tools for a season: the bone tools from Ecsegfalva 23. – The Early Neolithic on the Great Hungarian Plain. Investigations of the Körös Culture Site of Ecsegfalva 23, County Békés. Vol. II. Ed. A. Whittle. (Varia Archaeologica Hungarica, XXI.) Publicationes Instituti Archaeologici Academiae Scientiarum Hungari, Budapest, 641–666.
Choyke, A. M. & Daróczi-Szabó, M. In print. The complete & usable tool: some life histories of prehistoric bone tools in Hungary. – Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the Worked Bone Research Group at Nanterre, August 27th–31st, 2007.
Choyke, A. M. & Kováts, I. In print.Tracing the personal through generations: Late Medieval and Ottoman combs. – Bestial Mirrors: Using Animals to Construct Human Identities in Medieval Europe. (VIA VIAS.) The Vienna Institute for Archaeological Science, University of Vienna.
Choyke, A. M., Vretemark, M. & Sten, S. 2004. Levels of social identity expressed in the refuse and worked bone from the Middle Bronze Age Százhalombatta-Földvár, Vatya culture, Hungary. – Behavior Behind Bones. The Zooarchaeology of Ritual, Religion, Status and Identity. Proceedings of the ICAZ 9th Conference, Durham, August 2002. Eds S. Jones O’Day, W. van Neer & A. Ervynck. Oxbow Books, Oxford, 177–189.
Christophersen, A. 1980. Håndverket i forandring. Studier i horn- og beinhåndverkets utvikling i Lund c:a 1000–1350. (Acta Archaeologica Lundensia, Series in 4º, 13.) Rudolf Habelt Verlag, CWK Gleerup, Bonn.
Gosden, C. & Marshall, Y. 1999. The cultural biography of objects. – The Cultural Biography of Objects. Eds Y. Marshall & C. Gosden. (World Archaeology, 31: 2.) Routledge, London, 169–178.
Haak, A. 2005. Tartu värava eeslinna tekkest, hävingust ning taaskujunemisest. Uusi andmeid arheoloogilistelt kaevamistelt 1996–2005. (Viljandi Muuseumi aastaraamat, 2005.) Viljandi, 68–87.
Heege, A. 2002. Einbeck im Mittelalter. Eine archäologisch-historische Spurensuche. (Studien zur Einbecker Geschichte, 17.) Isensee Verlag, Oldenburg.
Hurcombe, L. M. 2007. Archaeological Artefacts as Material Culture. Routledge, London.
Johanson, K. 2006. The contribution of stray finds for studying everyday practices – the example of stone axes. – EJA, 10: 2, 99–131.
Joy, J. & Armstrong Oma, K. 2008. The biographical approach: where do we go from here? Session abstract. – The Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists, Malta, 16–21 September 2008. Abstracts Book. University of Malta, 206–207.
Kondrat´eva, O. A. 1999. = Кондратьева О. A. “Язык” гребня. К вопросу о семиотическом статусе вещи. – Раннесредневековые древности Cеверной Руси и ее соседей. Ed. Е. Н. Носов. Институт истории материальной культуры Российской академии наук,Санкт-Петербург, 80–88.
Kopytoff, I. 1986. The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. – The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Ed. A. Appadurai. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 64–91.
Lubar, S. & Kingery, W. D.1993. Introduction. – History from Things. Essays on Material Culture. Eds S. Lubar & W. D. Kingery. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, viii–xvii.
Luik, H.1998. Muinas- ja keskaegsed luukammid Eestis. (MT, 6.) Tallinn.
Luik, H. 1999. Kammikujulised luu- ja pronksripatsid Eestis. – EAA, 3: 2, 131–159.
Luik, H. 2005. Luu- ja sarvesemed Eesti arheoloogilises leiumaterjalis viikingiajast keskajani. (Dissertationes archaeologiae Universitatis Tartuensis, 1.)Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tartu.
Malve, M. 2008. Arheoloogilised uuringud Tartu toomkirikus 2008. Report in preparation.
Rawson, J.1993. The ancestry of Chinese bronze vessels. – History from Things. Essays on Material Culture. Eds S. Lubar & W. D. Kingery. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, 51–73.
Roes, A.1963. Bone and Antler Objects from the Frisian Terp-Mounds. H. D. Tjeenk Willink & zoon, Haarlem.
Salve, K. 2000. Oh mu hiusta ilusta. Uskumus, tavand, kujund. (Sator, 1.) Tartu, 85–101. http://www.folklore.ee/rl/pubte/ee/sator/sator1/sator1-6.pdf
Shanks, M. 1998. The life of an artifact in an interpretive archaeology. – Fennoscandia archaeologica, XV, 15–30.
Smirnova, L. 2005. Comb-Making in Medieval Novgorod (950–1450). An Industry in Transition. (British Archaeological Reports. International series, 1369.) Archaeopress, Oxford.
Thomas, J. 2007. The trouble with material culture. – Overcoming the Modern Invention of Material Culture. Proceedings of the TAG Session Exeter 2006. Eds V. O. Jorge & J. Thomas. – Journal of Iberian Archaeology, 2006/2007, 9/10, 11–23.
Tvauri, A.2001. Muinas-Tartu. Uurimus Tartu muinaslinnuse ja asula asustusloost. (MT, 10.) Tartu.
Tvauri, A. 2002. Lõuna-Eesti noorema rauaaja linnuste ja külade arheoloogilise leiumaterjali erinevused. – Keskus – tagamaa – ääreala. Uurimusi asustushierarhia ja võimukeskuste kujunemisest Eestis. Ed. V. Lang. (MT, 11.) Tallinn, 275–300.
Ulbricht, I. 1978. Die Geweihverarbeitung in Haithabu. (Die Ausgrabungen in Haithabu, 7.) Karl Wachholtz Verlag, Neumünster.
Ulbricht, I.1984. Die Verarbeitung von Knochen, Geweih und Horn im mittelalterlichen Schleswig. (Ausgrabungen in Schleswig. Berichte und Studien, 3.) Karl Wachholtz Verlag, Neumünster.
