headerpos: 9509
 
 
  Trames
A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

ISSN 1736-7514 (electronic)  ISSN 1406-0922 (print)
Published since 1997

Trames
A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

ISSN 1736-7514 (electronic)  ISSN 1406-0922 (print)
Published since 1997

Publisher
Information
» Policy statement
» Editorial board
» Editorial programme
Article Publication Charges
Style sheet
Subscription Information
Support and Contact
List of Issues
» 2018
» 2017
» 2016
» 2015
» 2014
» 2013
» 2012
Vol. 16, Issue 4
Vol. 16, Issue 3
Vol. 16, Issue 2
Vol. 16, Issue 1
» 2011
» 2010
» 2009
» 2008
» Back Issues
» Back issues (full texts)
  in Google
Publisher
» Other journals
» Staff

ESTONIAN STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION AND DEFINITION OF CYBERBULLYING; pp. 323–343

(Full article in PDF format) DOI: 10.3176/tr.2012.4.02


Authors

Karin Naruskov, Piret Luik, Annalaura Nocentini, Ersilia Menesini

Abstract

Rapid development of information and communication technologies is having a direct impact on the lives of adolescents, and a new form of bullying has emerged. This study aims to examine how Estonian students perceive and define cyberbullying based on five cyberbullying criteria (imbalance of power, intention, repetition, anonymity, and publicity/privacy) and four types of cyberbullying behaviour (written-verbal, visual, exclusion, and impersonation). A quali-quanti approach was used consisting of focus groups and a questionnaire. Two mixed-gender focus groups of 12- and 15-year-old students were interviewed to deepen their perception in relation to cyberbullying criteria and behaviours. Results were used for the quantitative study. The questionnaire was conducted with 336 adolescents from twelve Estonian schools, aged from 11 to 17 years. Results by MDS revealed a two-dimensional model characterized by imbalance of power and anonymity. This study can help to improve understanding of the phenomenon with respect to student perceptions.

Keywords

cyberbullying, definition, scenarios, criteria of cyberbullying, types of cyberbullying, Estonia.

References

Borg , Ingwer and Patrick J. F. Groenen (2005) Modern multidimensional scaling. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.

Dooley , Julian J. , Jacek Pyżalsky , and Donna Cross (2009) “Cyberbullying versus face to face bullying: a theoretical and conceptual review”. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 217 , 4 , 182–188.

Gradinger , Petra , Dagmar Strohmeier , and Christiane Spiel (2010) “Definition and measurement of cyberbullying”. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 4 , 2 , 1–13.

Grigg , Dorothy Wunmi (2010) “Cyber-aggression: definition and concept of cyberbullying”. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling 20 , 2 , 143–156.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.20.2.143

Hinduja , Sameer and Justin W. Patchin (2008) “Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization”. Deviant Behavior 29 , 2 , 129–156.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816

Hinduja , Sameer and Justin W. Patchin (2009) Bullying beyond the schoolyard: preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks , CA: Sage Publications (Corwin Press).

Jaworska , Natalia and Angelina Chupetlovska-Anastasova (2009) “A review of multid.imensional scaling (MDS) and its utility in various psychological domains”. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 5 , 1 , 1–10.

Kowalski , Robin M. and Susan P. Limber (2007) “Electronic bullying among middle school students”. Journal of Adolescent Health 41 , S22–S30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017

Kowalski , Robin M. , Susan P. Limber , and Patricia W. Agatston (2008) Cyber bullying: bullying in the digital age. Malden , MA: Blackwell Publishing.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470694176

Krueger , Richard A. (1994). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Kruskal , Joseph B. (1964) “Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to nonmetric hypothesis”. Psychometrics 29 , 1–27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289565

Lenhart A. (2007) “Cyberbullying and online teens: Pew Internet & American life project”. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2007/PIP%20Cyberbullying%20Memo.pdf.pdf. Accessed 23.04.2012.

Li , Qing (2007) “Bullying in the new playground: research into cyberbullying and cyber victimiza­tion”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 23 , 4 , 435–454.

Menesini , Ersilia and Annalaura Nocentini (2009) “Cyberbullying definition and measurement; some critical considerations”. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 217 , 4 , 230–232.

Menesini , Ersilia , Ada Fonzi , and Peter K. Smith (2002) “Attribution of meanings to terms related to bullying: a comparison between teacher’s and pupil’s perspectives in Italy”. European Journal of Psychology of Education 17 , 4 , 393–406.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173593

Menesini , Ersilia , Annalaura Nocentini , Benedetta E. Palladino , Ann Frisén , Sofia Berne , Rosario Ortega-Ruiz , Juan Calmaestra , Herbert Scheithauer , Anja Schultze-Krumbholz , Piret Luik , Karin Naruskov , Catherine Blaya , Julien Berthaud and Peter K. Smith (2012) “Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: A comparison across six European countries”. Cyber­psychology , Behavior , and Social Networking 15 , 9 , 455–463.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0040

Mishna , Faye , Michael Saini and Steven Solomon (2009) “Ongoing and online: children and youth’s perception of cyberbullying.” Children and Youth Services Review 31 , 12 , 1222–1228.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.05.004

Monks , Claire P. and Peter K. Smith (2006) “Definitions of bullying: age differences in under­standing of the term , and the role of experience”. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 24 , 4 , 801–821.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151005X82352

Morgan , David L. (1988) Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park , CA: Sage.

Nocentini , Annalaura , Juan J. Calmaestra , Anja Schultze-Krumblholz , Herbert Scheithauer , Rosario Ortega , and Ersilia Menesini (2010) “Cyberbullying: labels , behaviours and definition in three European countries”. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling 20 , 2 , 129–142.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.20.2.129

Olweus , Dan (1999) “Sweden”. In The nature of school bullying: a cross-national perspective , 7–27. Peter K. Smith , Yohji Morit , Josine Junger-Tas , Dan Olweus , Richard Catalano , and Philip Slee , eds. London: Routledge.

Patchin , Justin W. and Sameer Hinduja (2010) “Cyberbullying and self-esteem”. Journal of School Health 80 , 12 , 614–621.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00548.x

Shariff , Shaheen (2008) Cyber-bullying: issues and solutions for the school , the classroom and the home. Abington , Oxfordshire , UK: Routledge (Taylor & Frances Group).

Slonje , Robert and Peter K. Smith (2008) “Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying?” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 49 , 2 , 147–154.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x

Smith , Peter K. , Helen Cowie , Ragnar F. Olafsson , and Andy P.D. Liefooghe (2002) “Definitions of bullying: a comparison of terms used , and age and gender differences , in a fourteen-country international comparison”. Child Development 73 , 4 , 1119–1133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00461

Smith , Peter K. , Jess Mahdavi , Manuel Carvalho , Sonja Fisher , Shanette Russell , and Neil Tippett (2008) “Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils”. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 49 , 4 , 376–385.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x

Smorti , Andrea , Ersilia Menesini and Peter K. Smith (2003) “Parents’ definition of children’s bullying in a five-country comparison”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 34 , 4 , 417–432.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022103034004003

Tsogo , L. , M. J. Masson and Anna Bardot (2000) “Multidimensional scaling methods for many-object sets: a review”. Multivariate Behavioral Research 35 , 3 , 307–319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3503_02

Vaillancourt , Tracy , Patricia McDougall , Shelley Hymel , Amanda Krygsman , Jessie Miller , Kelley Stiver and Clinton Davis (2008) “Bullying: are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing?” International Journal of Behavioural Development 32 , 6 , 486–495.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025408095553

Vandebosch , Heidi and Katrien Van Cleemput (2008) “Defining cyberbullying: a qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters”. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11 , 4 , 4499–4503.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0042

Willard , Nancy E. (2007) Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: responding to the challenge of online social aggression , threats , and distress. Champaign , Illinois: Research Press.

Williams , Kipling D. , Christopher K. T. Cheung , and Wilma Choi (2000) “Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the internet”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 , 5 , 748–762.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748

 
Back

Current Issue: Vol. 22, Issue 3, 2018




Publishing schedule:
No. 1: 20 March
No. 2: 20 June
No. 3: 20 September
No. 4: 20 December